Crepidiastrum platyphyllum(Franch. & Sav.) Kitam.

WFO wfo-0000037639 Accepted WFO 2026-06 6 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–f · 2 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Crepidiastrum platyphyllum, photographed by Marco Mussita
fig. a Marco Mussita, CC BY 4.0 / 2017-10-31 / obs. 11580662

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 7 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Crepidiastrum lanceolatum var. latifolium Nakai
  • Crepidiastrum lanceolatum var. platyphyllum (Franch. & Sav.) Tuyama
  • Crepis integra var. platyphylla Franch. & Sav.
  • Crepis lanceolata var. platyphylla (Franch. & Sav.) Makino
  • Ixeris lanceolata subsp. platyphylla (Franch. & Sav.) Stebbins
  • Lactuca lanceolata var. platyphylla (Franch. & Sav.) Makino
  • Lactuca platyphylla (Franch. & Sav.) Makino

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.