Cotoneaster glaucophyllusFranch.

WFO wfo-0000987455 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, photographed by Leon Perrie
fig. a Leon Perrie, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-12 / obs. 205364869

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

The specimen a real sheet, in a real collection

Herbarium
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Accession
K000075685
Filed as
Cotoneaster glaucophyllus Franch.
Det. by
Marquand, C.W.
Collected
Forrest, G. 1912-05-01
Origin
CN
The sheet
View the digitised specimen (CC BY 4.0)

A real pressed plant, in a real collection, under the accession number above. Not an illustration of one. The holding institution does not serve this sheet’s image to third parties, so there is no photograph here. The record is real and the link goes to it. Where we hold no openly licensed sheet for a species this section is simply absent, and where a sheet never recorded who determined it, that field stays empty rather than being filled in. Roughly half of all herbarium sheets never recorded a determiner, which is ordinary.

Native range 2 botanical countries

Regions where Cotoneaster glaucophyllus is native: China South-Central, China Southeast China South-CentralChina Southeast
Native distribution of Cotoneaster glaucophyllus, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
China South-Central CHC ASIA-TEMPERATE
China Southeast CHS

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 36 in flower of 258 examined

Proportion of examined Cotoneaster glaucophyllus in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 6 12 50% 25% to 75%
Feb 0 12 0% 0% to 24%
Mar 0 21 0% 0% to 15%
Apr 0 61 0% 0% to 6%
May 0 56 0% 0% to 6%
Jun 0 23 0% 0% to 14%
Jul 0 22 0% 0% to 15%
Aug 1 6 17% 3% to 56%
Sep 1 4 too few examined
Oct 0 3 too few examined
Nov 10 17 59% 36% to 78%
Dec 18 21 86% 65% to 95%

Peak flowering in Dec. Each bar is the share of Cotoneaster glaucophyllus observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 36 of 258 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 2 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 905 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low 1.6 °C 7.0 °C 11.2 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 18.7 °C 21.9 °C 26.7 °C
Annual rainfall 609 mm 1,004 mm 2,360 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 70 mm 166 mm 413 mm

It is found where winters are cool but frost is light or absent. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 905 research-grade observations of Cotoneaster glaucophyllus that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 11 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Cotoneaster arbusculus G.Klotz
  • Cotoneaster glaucophyllus f. serotinus (Hutch.) Stapf
  • Cotoneaster meiophyllus (W.W.Sm.) G.Klotz
  • Cotoneaster serotinus Hutch.
  • Cotoneaster vestitus (W.W.Sm.) Flinck & B.Hylmö
  • Photinia rosifoliolata H.Lév.
  • Pyrus arbuscula (G.Klotz) M.F.Fay & Christenh.
  • Pyrus crataegaster M.F.Fay & Christenh.
  • Pyrus glaucophylla (Franch.) M.F.Fay & Christenh.
  • Pyrus meiophylla (W.W.Sm.) M.F.Fay & Christenh.
  • Pyrus pendula M.F.Fay & Christenh.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.