Clevea spathysii(Lindenb.) Müll.Frib.

WFO wfo-1000017075 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 5 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 5 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Clevea spathysii, photographed by Eleftherios Katsillis
fig. a Eleftherios Katsillis, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-01-05 / obs. 174962554

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 17 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Athalamia andina (Spruce) S.Hatt.
  • Athalamia pygmaea R.M.Schust.
  • Athalamia robusta (Steph.) S.Hatt.
  • Athalamia spathysii (Lindenb.) S.Hatt.
  • Clevea andina Spruce
  • Clevea limbata (Austin) Solms ex Steph.
  • Clevea robusta Steph.
  • Clevea rousseliana (Mont.) Leitg. ex Steph.
  • Dumortiera spathysii (Lindenb.) Nees
  • Fimbraria rousseliana (Mont.) Steph.
  • Lunularia spathysii (Lindenb.) Nees & Bisch.
  • Marchantia spathysii Lindenb.
  • Otiona rousseliana (Mont.) Dumort.
  • Plagiochasma rousselianum Mont.
  • Rupinia rousseliana (Mont.) Trevis.
  • Sauteria limbata Austin
  • Spathysia spathysii (Lindenb.) Schiffn.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.