Cistanthe umbellata(Torr.) Hershk.

Mt. Hood pussypaws

WFO wfo-0000607173 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Cistanthe umbellata, photographed by Tim Messick
fig. a Tim Messick, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-05-22 / obs. 203383866

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 11 botanical countries

Regions where Cistanthe umbellata is native: British Columbia, California, Colorado, Idaho, Mexico Northwest, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming British ColumbiaCaliforniaColoradoIdahoMexico NorthwestMontanaNevadaOregonUtahWashingtonWyoming
Native distribution of Cistanthe umbellata, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
British Columbia BRC NORTHERN AMERICA
California CAL
Colorado COL
Idaho IDA
Mexico Northwest MXN
Montana MNT
Nevada NEV
Oregon ORE
Utah UTA
Washington WAS
Wyoming WYO

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 246 in flower of 282 examined

Proportion of examined Cistanthe umbellata in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 0 0 too few examined
Feb 0 0 too few examined
Mar 0 0 too few examined
Apr 1 1 too few examined
May 14 16 88% 64% to 97%
Jun 65 75 87% 77% to 93%
Jul 104 108 96% 91% to 99%
Aug 49 59 83% 72% to 91%
Sep 11 17 65% 41% to 83%
Oct 2 5 40% 12% to 77%
Nov 0 1 too few examined
Dec 0 0 too few examined

Peak flowering in Jul. Each bar is the share of Cistanthe umbellata observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 246 of 282 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 6 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 6 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Calyptridium umbellatum (Torr.) Greene
  • Calyptridium umbellatum var. caudiciferum (A.Gray) Jeps.
  • Cistanthe umbellata var. caudicifera (A.Gray) Kartesz & Gandhi
  • Cistanthe umbellata var. umbellata
  • Spraguea umbellata Torr.
  • Spraguea umbellata var. caudicifera A.Gray

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.