Cienfuegosia tripartita(Kunth) Gürke

WFO wfo-0000604677 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC0

Plate 1 figs. a–g · 7 separate observations

Cienfuegosia tripartita, photographed by Manuel Roncal
fig. a Manuel Roncal, CC0 1.0 / 2022-02-16 / obs. 180228122

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 2 botanical countries

Regions where Cienfuegosia tripartita is native: Ecuador, Peru EcuadorPeru
Native distribution of Cienfuegosia tripartita, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Ecuador ECU SOUTHERN AMERICA
Peru PER

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Also published as 4 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Fugosia tripartita (Kunth) Steud.
  • Hibiscus cuneatus Kuntze
  • Hibiscus tripartitus (Kunth) Kuntze
  • Redoutea tripartita Kunth

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.