Carex richardsoniiR.Br.

Richardson's sedge

WFO wfo-0000350692 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Carex richardsonii, photographed by Chris Hoess
fig. a Chris Hoess, CC BY-SA 4.0 / 2020-04-17 / obs. 67393240

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

The specimen a real sheet, in a real collection

Herbarium
The New York Botanical Garden
Accession
11299
Filed as
Carex richardsonii R.Br.
Det. by
K. K. Mackenzie
Collected
J. Richardson
Origin
CA
The sheet
View the digitised specimen (CC BY 4.0)

A real pressed plant, in a real collection, under the accession number above. Not an illustration of one. The holding institution does not serve this sheet’s image to third parties, so there is no photograph here. The record is real and the link goes to it. Where we hold no openly licensed sheet for a species this section is simply absent, and where a sheet never recorded who determined it, that field stays empty rather than being filled in. Roughly half of all herbarium sheets never recorded a determiner, which is ordinary.

Native range 21 botanical countries

Regions where Carex richardsonii is native: Alberta, British Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Manitoba, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Northwest Territories, Ohio, Ontario, Pennsylvania, Québec, Saskatchewan, South Dakota, Vermont, Wisconsin, Wyoming AlbertaBritish ColumbiaIllinoisIndianaIowaManitobaMarylandMichiganMinnesotaNew YorkNorth DakotaNorthwest TerritoriesOhioOntarioPennsylvaniaQuébecSaskatchewanSouth DakotaVermontWisconsinWyoming
Native distribution of Carex richardsonii, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Alberta ABT NORTHERN AMERICA
British Columbia BRC
Illinois ILL
Indiana INI
Iowa IOW
Manitoba MAN
Maryland MRY
Michigan MIC
Minnesota MIN
New York NWY
North Dakota NDA
Northwest Territories NWT
Ohio OHI
Ontario ONT
Pennsylvania PEN
Québec QUE
Saskatchewan SAS
South Dakota SDA
Vermont VER
Wisconsin WIS
Wyoming WYO

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 75 in flower of 93 examined

Proportion of examined Carex richardsonii in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 0 0 too few examined
Feb 0 0 too few examined
Mar 1 1 too few examined
Apr 20 22 91% 72% to 97%
May 44 54 81% 69% to 90%
Jun 10 16 63% 39% to 82%
Jul 0 0 too few examined
Aug 0 0 too few examined
Sep 0 0 too few examined
Oct 0 0 too few examined
Nov 0 0 too few examined
Dec 0 0 too few examined

Peak flowering in Apr. Each bar is the share of Carex richardsonii observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 75 of 93 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 9 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 476 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low -17.9 °C -11.5 °C -6.7 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 21.2 °C 25.1 °C 28.4 °C
Annual rainfall 450 mm 908 mm 1,100 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 50 mm 134 mm 226 mm

It is found where winters are severely cold. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 476 research-grade observations of Carex richardsonii that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 2 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Carex richardsonii f. richardsonii
  • Carex richardsonii var. exserta Fernald

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.