Calochortus striatus (alkali mariposa lily)

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Calochortus striatus, photographed by Kimball Garrett — fig. a Kimball Garrett, CC0 1.0 / 2022-05-02 / obs. 193941363

Calochortus striatus, photographed by paulexcoff — fig. b paulexcoff, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 189692853

Calochortus striatus, photographed by Scott Yarger — fig. c Scott Yarger, CC0 1.0 / obs. 70093454

Calochortus striatus, photographed by Ellen Watrous — fig. d Ellen Watrous, CC0 1.0 / obs. 113268460

Calochortus striatus, photographed by Rachel Smith — fig. e Rachel Smith, CC0 1.0 / obs. 15483273

Calochortus striatus, photographed by nmoorhatch — fig. f nmoorhatch, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 62058472

Calochortus striatus, photographed by Adam J. Searcy — fig. g Adam J. Searcy, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 63493507

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 2 botanical countries

Native distribution of Calochortus striatus, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.

Region	TDWG code	Continent
California	CAL	NORTHERN AMERICA
Nevada	NEV

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 369 in flower of 374 examined

100%

96%

100%

94%

Proportion of examined Calochortus striatus in flower, by month
Month	In flower	Examined	Share	95% interval
Jan	0	0	too few examined
Feb	0	0	too few examined
Mar	6	6	100%	61% to 100%
Apr	106	110	96%	91% to 99%
May	240	240	100%	98% to 100%
Jun	17	18	94%	74% to 99%
Jul	0	0	too few examined
Aug	0	0	too few examined
Sep	0	0	too few examined
Oct	0	0	too few examined
Nov	0	0	too few examined
Dec	0	0	too few examined

Peak flowering in Mar. Each bar is the share of Calochortus striatus observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 369 of 374 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 8 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 1 synonym

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

Calochortus comosus A.Nelson

Sourcesevery claim on this page

World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.