Calochortus obispoensis (San Luis mariposa lily)

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Calochortus obispoensis, photographed by Cricket Raspet — fig. a Cricket Raspet, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-06 / obs. 204054477

Calochortus obispoensis, photographed by Dee Shea Himes — fig. d Dee Shea Himes, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 201089468

Calochortus obispoensis, photographed by Amthinkia — fig. f Amthinkia, CC0 1.0 / obs. 197716429

Calochortus obispoensis, photographed by Zack Abbey — fig. g Zack Abbey, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 79214659

Calochortus obispoensis, photographed by paulexcoff — fig. h paulexcoff, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 78525692

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 1 botanical country

Native distribution of Calochortus obispoensis, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.

Region	TDWG code	Continent
California	CAL	NORTHERN AMERICA

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 486 in flower of 491 examined

83%

98%

100%

Proportion of examined Calochortus obispoensis in flower, by month
Month	In flower	Examined	Share	95% interval
Jan	0	0	too few examined
Feb	0	0	too few examined
Mar	0	1	too few examined
Apr	5	6	83%	44% to 97%
May	130	133	98%	94% to 99%
Jun	265	265	100%	99% to 100%
Jul	85	85	100%	96% to 100%
Aug	1	1	too few examined
Sep	0	0	too few examined
Oct	0	0	too few examined
Nov	0	0	too few examined
Dec	0	0	too few examined

Peak flowering in Jun. Each bar is the share of Calochortus obispoensis observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 486 of 491 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 8 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 2 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

Calochortus weedii var. obispoensis (Lemmon) Purdy
Cyclobothra obispoensis (Lemmon) Hoover

Sourcesevery claim on this page

World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.