Braya humilis(C.A.Mey.) B.L.Rob.

WFO wfo-0001216369 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 7 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 7 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Braya humilis, photographed by Юлия
fig. a Юлия, CC BY 4.0 / 2021-05-22 / obs. 130701304

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

The specimen a real sheet, in a real collection

Herbarium
The New York Botanical Garden
Accession
02201008
Filed as
Braya humilis (C.A.Mey.) B.L.Rob.
Det. by
H. W. Rickett 1932-01-01
Collected
I. S. Onion 1860
Origin
CA
The sheet
View the digitised specimen (CC BY 4.0)

A real pressed plant, in a real collection, under the accession number above. Not an illustration of one. The holding institution does not serve this sheet’s image to third parties, so there is no photograph here. The record is real and the link goes to it. Where we hold no openly licensed sheet for a species this section is simply absent, and where a sheet never recorded who determined it, that field stays empty rather than being filled in. Roughly half of all herbarium sheets never recorded a determiner, which is ordinary.

Flowering 32 in flower of 33 examined

Proportion of examined Braya humilis in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 0 0 too few examined
Feb 0 0 too few examined
Mar 1 1 too few examined
Apr 2 2 too few examined
May 12 12 100% 76% to 100%
Jun 9 9 100% 70% to 100%
Jul 4 4 too few examined
Aug 4 5 80% 38% to 96%
Sep 0 0 too few examined
Oct 0 0 too few examined
Nov 0 0 too few examined
Dec 0 0 too few examined

Peak flowering in May. Each bar is the share of Braya humilis observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 32 of 33 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 9 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 199 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low -35.1 °C -17.7 °C -9.9 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 13.7 °C 20.5 °C 29.6 °C
Annual rainfall 310 mm 549 mm 1,020 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 9 mm 44 mm 174 mm

It is found where winters are arctic. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 199 research-grade observations of Braya humilis that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 32 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Braya humilis f. biloba Böcher
  • Braya humilis subsp. arctica (Böcher) Rollins
  • Braya humilis subsp. ventosa Rollins
  • Braya humilis var. abbei (Böcher) B.Boivin
  • Braya humilis var. humilis
  • Braya humilis var. interior (Böcher) B.Boivin
  • Braya humilis var. laurentiana (Böcher) B.Boivin
  • Braya humilis var. ventosa (Rollins) B.Boivin
  • Braya intermedia T.J.Sørensen
  • Braya novae-angliae (Rydb.) T.J.Sørensen
  • Braya novae-angliae subsp. abbei Böcher
  • Braya novae-angliae subsp. novae-angliae T.J. Sorensen
  • Braya novae-angliae subsp. ventosa (Rollins) Böcher
  • Braya novae-angliae var. interior Böcher
  • Braya novae-angliae var. laurentiana Böcher
  • Braya richardsonii Fernald
  • Neotorularia humilis f. angustifolia (C.H.An) Ma
  • Neotorularia humilis f. glabrata (C.H.An) Ma
  • Neotorularia humilis f. grandiflora (O.E.Schulz) Ma
  • Neotorularia humilis f. hygrophila (E.Fourn.) Z.X.An
  • Pilosella novae-angliae Rydb.
  • Pilosella richardsonii Rydb.
  • Sisymbrium humilis var. hygrophilum E.Fourn.
  • Sisymbrium humilis var. piasezkii (Maxim.) Maxim.

and 8 more.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.