Berkheya decurrens(Thunb.) Willd.

WFO wfo-0000127192 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 7 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 7 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Berkheya decurrens, photographed by Andrew Gillespie
fig. a Andrew Gillespie, CC BY-SA 4.0 / 2021-05-01 / obs. 125673856

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 1 botanical country

Regions where Berkheya decurrens is native: Cape Provinces Cape Provinces
Native distribution of Berkheya decurrens, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Cape Provinces CPP AFRICA

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 50 in flower of 51 examined

Proportion of examined Berkheya decurrens in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 8 8 100% 68% to 100%
Feb 11 12 92% 65% to 99%
Mar 6 6 100% 61% to 100%
Apr 4 4 too few examined
May 11 11 100% 74% to 100%
Jun 2 2 too few examined
Jul 3 3 too few examined
Aug 1 1 too few examined
Sep 0 0 too few examined
Oct 1 1 too few examined
Nov 1 1 too few examined
Dec 2 2 too few examined

Peak flowering in Jan. Each bar is the share of Berkheya decurrens observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 50 of 51 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 8 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 85 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low 2.3 °C 7.4 °C 13.1 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 23.2 °C 25.5 °C 27.0 °C
Annual rainfall 550 mm 673 mm 849 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 61 mm 97 mm 140 mm

It is found where winters are cool but frost is light or absent. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 85 research-grade observations of Berkheya decurrens that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 22 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Berkheya echinopoda (DC.) Fourc.
  • Berkheya echinopoda (DC.) Schönland
  • Berkheya glabriuscula (DC.) Schönland
  • Berkheya membranifolia Hubbard ex L.H.Bailey
  • Berkheya petiolata (DC.) Schönland
  • Berkheya polyacantha (DC.) Schönland
  • Crocodilodes decurrens Kuntze
  • Crocodilodes echinopodum Kuntze
  • Crocodilodes glabriuscula Kuntze
  • Crocodilodes helianthiflora (DC.) Kuntze
  • Crocodilodes membranifolia Kuntze
  • Crocodilodes petiolata Kuntze
  • Crocodilodes polyacantha Kuntze
  • Crocodilodes scolymodes (DC.) Kuntze
  • Rohria decurrens Thunb.
  • Stobaea echinopoda DC.
  • Stobaea glabriuscula DC.
  • Stobaea helianthiflora DC.
  • Stobaea membranifolia DC.
  • Stobaea petiolata DC.
  • Stobaea polyacantha DC.
  • Stobaea scolymoides DC.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.