Bencomia exstipulataSvent.

Guanches’ roseSummit Bencomia

WFO wfo-0001003863 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–g · 4 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 4 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Bencomia exstipulata, photographed by Christoph Moning
fig. a Christoph Moning, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-02-24 / obs. 184192562
Bencomia exstipulata, photographed by Christian Berg
fig. b Christian Berg, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 175246826
Bencomia exstipulata, photographed by Andre Hosper
fig. c Andre Hosper, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 12520830
Bencomia exstipulata, photographed by Christoph Moning
fig. d Christoph Moning, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 59888397
Bencomia exstipulata, photographed by Christoph Moning
fig. e Christoph Moning, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 184192573
Bencomia exstipulata, photographed by Christian Berg
fig. f Christian Berg, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 175246849
Bencomia exstipulata, photographed by Christoph Moning
fig. g Christoph Moning, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 184192587

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.