Bellucia mespiloides(Miq.) J.F.Macbr.

WFO wfo-0001080974 Accepted WFO 2026-06 6 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–f · 1 observation

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Bellucia mespiloides, photographed by Eduardo Chacón Madrigal
fig. a Eduardo Chacón Madrigal, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-05-29 / obs. 201581747
Bellucia mespiloides, photographed by Eduardo Chacón Madrigal
fig. b Eduardo Chacón Madrigal, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 201581789
Bellucia mespiloides, photographed by Eduardo Chacón Madrigal
fig. c Eduardo Chacón Madrigal, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 201581842
Bellucia mespiloides, photographed by Eduardo Chacón Madrigal
fig. d Eduardo Chacón Madrigal, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 201581688
Bellucia mespiloides, photographed by Eduardo Chacón Madrigal
fig. e Eduardo Chacón Madrigal, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 201581887
Bellucia mespiloides, photographed by Eduardo Chacón Madrigal
fig. f Eduardo Chacón Madrigal, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 201581938

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

The specimen a real sheet, in a real collection

Herbarium
The New York Botanical Garden
Accession
02434452
Filed as
Bellucia mespiloides (Miq.) J.F.Macbr.
Det. by
D. S. Penneys 2010-01-01
Collected
A. Rodríguez 1999-02-08
Origin
CR
The sheet
View the digitised specimen (CC BY 4.0)

A real pressed plant, in a real collection, under the accession number above. Not an illustration of one. We link to the digitised sheet rather than rehosting it, because the holding institutions do not serve their images to third parties reliably and we are not going to show you a picture we cannot actually deliver. Where we hold no openly licensed sheet for a species this section is simply absent, and where a sheet never recorded who determined it, that field stays empty rather than being filled in. Roughly half of all sheets never recorded a determiner, which is ordinary.

Native range 10 botanical countries

Regions where Bellucia mespiloides is native: Brazil North, Colombia, Costa Rica, French Guiana, Guyana, Nicaragua, Panamá, Peru, Suriname, Venezuela Brazil NorthColombiaCosta RicaFrench GuianaGuyanaNicaraguaPanamáPeruSurinameVenezuela
Native distribution of Bellucia mespiloides, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Brazil North BZN SOUTHERN AMERICA
Colombia CLM
Costa Rica COS
French Guiana FRG
Guyana GUY
Nicaragua NIC
Panamá PAN
Peru PER
Suriname SUR
Venezuela VEN

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Also published as 4 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Henriettea brunnescens Standl.
  • Henriettea sagotiana Naudin ex Triana
  • Loreya brunnescens (Standl.) Gleason
  • Loreya mespiloides Miq.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.