Baccharis dracunculifoliaDC.

WFO wfo-0000127667 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Baccharis dracunculifolia, photographed by Florencia Grattarola
fig. a Florencia Grattarola, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-05-14 / obs. 197622878

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 9 botanical countries

Regions where Baccharis dracunculifolia is native: Argentina Northeast, Argentina Northwest, Bolivia, Brazil South, Brazil Southeast, Brazil West-Central, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay Argentina NortheastArgentina NorthwestBoliviaBrazil SouthBrazil SoutheastBrazil West-CentralParaguayPeruUruguay
Native distribution of Baccharis dracunculifolia, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Argentina Northeast AGE SOUTHERN AMERICA
Argentina Northwest AGW
Bolivia BOL
Brazil South BZS
Brazil Southeast BZL
Brazil West-Central BZC
Paraguay PAR
Peru PER
Uruguay URU

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 38 in flower of 69 examined

Proportion of examined Baccharis dracunculifolia in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 1 1 too few examined
Feb 7 8 88% 53% to 98%
Mar 3 5 60% 23% to 88%
Apr 10 18 56% 34% to 75%
May 3 5 60% 23% to 88%
Jun 2 6 33% 10% to 70%
Jul 1 4 too few examined
Aug 5 7 71% 36% to 92%
Sep 5 9 56% 27% to 81%
Oct 0 4 too few examined
Nov 1 2 too few examined
Dec 0 0 too few examined

Peak flowering in Feb. Each bar is the share of Baccharis dracunculifolia observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 38 of 69 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 5 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 13 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Baccharis axilliflora Steud. ex Malag.
  • Baccharis bracteata Hook. & Arn.
  • Baccharis dracunculifolia f. dracunculifolia
  • Baccharis dracunculifolia f. spectabilis Heering
  • Baccharis dracunculifolia f. subviscosa Kuntze
  • Baccharis dracunculifolia subsp. tandilensis (Speg.) Giuliano
  • Baccharis dracunculifolia var. dracunculifolia
  • Baccharis dracunculifolia var. integerrima Kuntze
  • Baccharis paucidentata Sch.Bip. ex Baker
  • Baccharis paucidentata Sch.Bip.
  • Baccharis pulverulenta Klatt
  • Baccharis tandilensis Speg.
  • Conyza linearifolia Spreng.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.