Arthropodium milleflorum(Redouté) J.F.Macbr.

WFO wfo-0000761064 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Arthropodium milleflorum, photographed by yatesy
fig. a yatesy, CC BY 4.0 / 2021-12-28 / obs. 174087483

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

The specimen a real sheet, in a real collection

Herbarium
The New York Botanical Garden
Accession
03897445
Filed as
Arthropodium milleflorum (Redouté) J.F.Macbr.
Det. by
not recorded on this sheet
Collected
not recorded
Origin
not recorded
The sheet
View the digitised specimen (CC BY 4.0)

A real pressed plant, in a real collection, under the accession number above. Not an illustration of one. The holding institution does not serve this sheet’s image to third parties, so there is no photograph here. The record is real and the link goes to it. Where we hold no openly licensed sheet for a species this section is simply absent, and where a sheet never recorded who determined it, that field stays empty rather than being filled in. Roughly half of all herbarium sheets never recorded a determiner, which is ordinary.

Native range 5 botanical countries

Regions where Arthropodium milleflorum is native: New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria New South WalesQueenslandSouth AustraliaTasmaniaVictoria
Native distribution of Arthropodium milleflorum, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
New South Wales NSW AUSTRALASIA
Queensland QLD
South Australia SOA
Tasmania TAS
Victoria VIC

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 194 in flower of 198 examined

Proportion of examined Arthropodium milleflorum in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 70 71 99% 92% to 100%
Feb 15 15 100% 80% to 100%
Mar 7 8 88% 53% to 98%
Apr 5 5 100% 57% to 100%
May 0 1 too few examined
Jun 1 1 too few examined
Jul 0 0 too few examined
Aug 0 0 too few examined
Sep 0 0 too few examined
Oct 1 2 too few examined
Nov 25 25 100% 87% to 100%
Dec 70 70 100% 95% to 100%

Peak flowering in Feb. Each bar is the share of Arthropodium milleflorum observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 194 of 198 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 6 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 1,018 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low -3.3 °C 2.8 °C 8.5 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 19.1 °C 23.1 °C 25.9 °C
Annual rainfall 653 mm 901 mm 1,549 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 113 mm 161 mm 233 mm

It is found where winters bring light frost. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 1,018 research-grade observations of Arthropodium milleflorum that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 12 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Anthericum milleflorum DC.
  • Anthericum paniculatum Andrews
  • Anthericum pendulum Hornem.
  • Arthropodium appendiculatum Fisch., C.A.Mey. & Avé-Lall.
  • Arthropodium elongatum DC.
  • Arthropodium lindleyi Kunth
  • Arthropodium minus Lindl.
  • Arthropodium paniculatum (Andrews) R.Br.
  • Arthropodium pendulum (Redouté) DC.
  • Phalangium milleflorum (DC.) Steud.
  • Phalangium paniculatum (Haw.) F.Delaroche
  • Phalangium pendulum (Hornem.) D.Delaroche

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.