Plate 1 figs. a–h · 5 observations
This species has been photographed under an open licence only 5 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.
Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.
Also published as 21 synonyms
A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.
- Amphidium crispatum (Kindb.) Broth.
- Amphidium lapponicum var. crispatum (Kindb.) Grout
- Amphidium sublapponicum (Müll.Hal.) Broth.
- Amphoridium crispatum (Kindb.) Paris
- Amphoridium lapponicum (Hedw.) Schimp.
- Amphoridium sublapponicum (Müll.Hal.) Paris
- Anictangium lapponicum Hedw.
- Anictangium striatum Brid.
- Anoectangium lapponicum (Hedw.) Schwägr.
- Bryum lapponicum (Hedw.) Dicks.
- Cylicocarpus lapponicus (Hedw.) Lindb.
- Didymodon lapponicus (Hedw.) Mitt.
- Didymodon turgescens Stirt.
- Gymnostomum lapponicum (Hedw.) F.Weber & D.Mohr
- Gymnostomum striatum Röhl.
- Hedwigia costata Bach.Pyl.
- Hymenostylium lapponicum (Hedw.) Fürnr. ex Hampe
- Schistidium striatum Brid.
- Zygodon crispatus Kindb.
- Zygodon lapponicus (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp.
- Zygodon sublapponicus Müll.Hal.
Sourcesevery claim on this page
- World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
- iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
- Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.