Agathosma cerefolia(Vent.) Bartl. & H.L.Wendl.

WFO wfo-0000523377 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 6 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 6 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Agathosma cerefolia, photographed by Nicola van Berkel
fig. a Nicola van Berkel, CC BY-SA 4.0 / 2021-09-23 / obs. 160690224

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 16 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Agathosma bartlingiana Eckl. & Zeyh.
  • Agathosma clavata Hoffmanns.
  • Agathosma melaleucoides Sond.
  • Agathosma obtusa E.Mey.
  • Agathosma obtusifolia C.Presl
  • Agathosma patens hort. ex Bartl. & H.L.Wendl.
  • Agathosma stadensis Eckl. & Zeyh.
  • Agathosma suaveolens Eckl. & Zeyh.
  • Bucco cerefolium Roem. & Schult.
  • Diosma cerefolia Vent.
  • Diosma microphylla (G.Mey. ex Bartl. & H.L.Wendl.) Spreng.
  • Diosma stadensis (Eckl. & Zeyh.) D.Dietr.
  • Diosma suaveolens (Eckl. & Zeyh.) D.Dietr.
  • Hartogia cerefolia (Vent.) Kuntze
  • Hartogia melaleucoides (Sond.) Kuntze
  • Hartogia microphylla (G.Mey. ex Bartl. & H.L.Wendl.) Kuntze

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.