Acourtia wrightii(A.Gray) Reveal & R.M.King

brownfoot

WFO wfo-0000001261 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Acourtia wrightii, photographed by Michelle W. (鍾偉瑋)
fig. a Michelle W. (鍾偉瑋), CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-05 / obs. 204505132

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 8 botanical countries

Regions where Acourtia wrightii is native: Arizona, Mexico Northeast, Mexico Northwest, Mexico Southwest, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Utah ArizonaMexico NortheastMexico NorthwestMexico SouthwestNevadaNew MexicoTexasUtah
Native distribution of Acourtia wrightii, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Arizona ARI NORTHERN AMERICA
Mexico Northeast MXE
Mexico Northwest MXN
Mexico Southwest MXS
Nevada NEV
New Mexico NWM
Texas TEX
Utah UTA

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 174 in flower of 249 examined

Proportion of examined Acourtia wrightii in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 3 9 33% 12% to 65%
Feb 1 4 too few examined
Mar 3 10 30% 11% to 60%
Apr 15 24 63% 43% to 79%
May 47 54 87% 76% to 94%
Jun 10 19 53% 32% to 73%
Jul 14 16 88% 64% to 97%
Aug 26 31 84% 67% to 93%
Sep 12 16 75% 51% to 90%
Oct 26 32 81% 65% to 91%
Nov 7 16 44% 23% to 67%
Dec 10 18 56% 34% to 75%

Peak flowering in Jul. Each bar is the share of Acourtia wrightii observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 174 of 249 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. One month has fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for it. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 1,019 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low -1.7 °C 2.3 °C 6.2 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 30.2 °C 35.2 °C 39.1 °C
Annual rainfall 235 mm 378 mm 638 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 14 mm 28 mm 78 mm

It is found where winters bring light frost. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 1,019 research-grade observations of Acourtia wrightii that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 5 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Perezia arizonica A.Gray
  • Perezia schaffneri Gray
  • Perezia wrightii A.Gray
  • Perezia wrightii var. arizonica M.E.Jones
  • Perezia wrightii var. wrightii

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.