Xenophyllum

Accepted species 22 Documented here 5 Family Asteraceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Xenophyllum humile (Kunth) V.A.Funk 31 documented
Xenophyllum dactylophyllum (Sch.Bip.) V.A.Funk 7 documented
Xenophyllum incisum (Phil.) V.A.Funk 6 documented
Xenophyllum poposum (Phil.) V.A.Funk 5 documented
Xenophyllum crassum (S.F.Blake) V.A.Funk 3 documented
Xenophyllum ciliolatum (A.Gray) V.A.Funk 3 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum weddellii (Phil.) V.A.Funk 2 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum acerosum (Cuatrec.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum amblydactylum (S.F.Blake) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum decorum (S.F.Blake) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum digitatum (Wedd.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum esquilachense (Cuatrec.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum fontii (Cuatrec.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum lycopodioides (S.F.Blake) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum marcidum (S.F.Blake) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum oscartovarii E.Linares, J.Campos, Nauray, Vicente Orell. & A.Galán 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum pseudodigitatum (Rockh.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum rigidum (Kunth) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum rosenii (R.E.Fr.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum roseum (Hieron.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum sotarense (Hieron.) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate
Xenophyllum staffordiae (Sandwith) V.A.Funk 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.