Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voyria tenella | Guilding ex Hook. | 23 | documented |
| Voyria parasitica | (Schltdl. & Cham.) Ruyters & Maas | 19 | documented |
| Voyria aphylla | (Jacq.) Pers. | 16 | documented |
| Voyria obconica | Progel | 11 | documented |
| Voyria flavescens | Griseb. | 8 | documented |
| Voyria rosea | Aubl. | 7 | documented |
| Voyria aurantiaca | Splitg. | 6 | documented |
| Voyria caerulea | Aubl. | 6 | documented |
| Voyria tenuiflora | Griseb. | 3 | documented |
| Voyria corymbosa | Splitg. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria acuminata | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria alvesiana | E.F.Guim., T.S.Mendes & N.G.Silva | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria bicolor | H.Maas & O.Lachenaud | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria chionea | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria clavata | Splitg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria crucitasensis | Y.Guillén & G.Vargas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria kupperi | (Suess.) Ruyters & Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria primuloides | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria pulcherrima | (Standl.) L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria spruceana | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Voyria truncata | (Standl.) Standl. & Steyerm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.