Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viguieranthus alternans | (Benth.) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus ambongensis | (R.Vig.) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus brevipennatus | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus cylindricostachys | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus densinervus | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus glaber | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus glandulosus | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus kony | (R.Vig.) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus longiracemosus | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus megalophyllus | (R.Vig.) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus perrieri | (R.Vig.) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus pervillei | (Drake) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus scottianus | (R.Vig.) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus simulans | (R.Vig.) Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus subauriculatus | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus umbilicus | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus unifoliolatus | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Viguieranthus variabilis | Villiers | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.