Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veratrum viride | Aiton | 1,698 | documented |
| Veratrum californicum | Durand | 755 | documented |
| Veratrum lobelianum | Bernh. | 513 | documented |
| Veratrum album | L. | 287 | documented |
| Veratrum nigrum | L. | 168 | documented |
| Veratrum fimbriatum | A.Gray | 80 | documented |
| Veratrum insolitum | Jeps. | 50 | documented |
| Veratrum formosanum | O.Loes. | 37 | documented |
| Veratrum oxysepalum | Turcz. | 33 | documented |
| Veratrum schindleri | O.Loes. | 18 | documented |
| Veratrum maackii | Regel | 14 | documented |
| Veratrum dahuricum | (Turcz.) O.Loes. | 13 | documented |
| Veratrum stamineum | Maxim. | 3 | documented |
| Veratrum × tonussii | Poldini | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum albiflorum | Tolm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum anticleoides | (Trautv. & C.A.Mey.) Takeda & Miyake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum dolichopetalum | O.Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum grandiflorum | (Maxim. ex Miq.) O.Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum longibracteatum | Takeda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum maximum | (Nakai) M.N.Tamura & N.S.Lee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum mengtzeanum | O.Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum micranthum | F.T.Wang & Tang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum oblongum | O.Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum shanense | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum taliense | O.Loes. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veratrum versicolor | Nakai | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.