Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uraria crinita | (L.) Desv. ex DC. | 113 | documented |
| Uraria rufescens | (DC.) Schindl. | 48 | documented |
| Uraria lagopodioides | (L.) DC. | 30 | documented |
| Uraria picta | (Jacq.) Desv. ex DC. | 3 | documented |
| Uraria acaulis | Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria acuminata | Kurz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria balansae | Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria brevissima | (Y.C.Yang & P.H.Huang) H.F.Wang, X.Y.Dong & K.P.Ma | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria campanulata | (Benth.) Gagnep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria candida | Backer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria cochinchinensis | Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria cordifolia | Wall. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria gossweileri | Baker f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria gracilis | Prain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria kurzii | Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria lacei | Craib | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria lagopus | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria oblonga | (Wall. ex Benth.) H.Ohashi & K.Ohashi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria pierrei | Schindl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria poilanei | Dy Phon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria prunellifolia | Graham ex Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria pseudoacuminata | W.Tokaew & Chantar. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria pulchra | Haines | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria rotundata | Craib | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uraria sinensis | (Hemsl.) Franch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.