Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uapaca bojeri | Baill. | 21 | documented |
| Uapaca kirkiana | Müll.Arg. | 18 | documented |
| Uapaca nitida | Müll.Arg. | 7 | documented |
| Uapaca acuminata | (Hutch.) Pax & K.Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca ambanjensis | Leandri | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca amplifolia | Denis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca densifolia | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca ferruginea | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca guineensis | Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca heudelotii | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca lissopyrena | Radcl.-Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca littoralis | Denis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca louvelii | Denis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca mole | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca niangadoumae | Breteler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca pilosa | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca pynaertii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca robynsii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca rufopilosa | (De Wild.) P.A.Duvign. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca sansibarica | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca staudtii | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca teusczii | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca thouarsii | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca togoensis | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Uapaca vanhouttei | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.