Tulbaghia

Accepted species 28 Documented here 11 Family Amaryllidaceae

Accepted species 28 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Tulbaghia capensis L. 111 documented
Tulbaghia alliacea L.f. 65 documented
Tulbaghia violacea Harv. 62 documented
Tulbaghia acutiloba Harv. 51 documented
Tulbaghia leucantha Baker 35 documented
Tulbaghia dregeana Kunth 23 documented
Tulbaghia maritima Vosa 22 documented
Tulbaghia montana Vosa 12 documented
Tulbaghia natalensis Baker 6 documented
Tulbaghia coddii Vosa & R.B.Burb. 3 documented
Tulbaghia ludwigiana Harv. 3 documented
Tulbaghia aequinoctialis Welw. ex Baker 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia calcarea Engl. & Krause 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia cameronii Baker 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia cernua Fisch., C.A.Mey. & Avé-Lall. 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia cominsii Vosa 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia friesii Suess. 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia galpinii Schltr. 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia luebbertiana Engl. & Krause 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia macrocarpa Vosa 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia nutans Vosa 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia pretoriensis Vosa & Condy 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia rhodesica R.E.Fr. 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia siebertii (Vosa) Mich.Möller & G.I.Stafford 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia simmleri Beauverd 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia tenuior K.Krause & Dinter 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia transvaalensis Vosa 0 below the evidence gate
Tulbaghia verdoornia Vosa & R.B.Burb. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.