Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trochocarpa laurina | (Rudge) R.Br. | 252 | documented |
| Trochocarpa thymifolia | (R.Br.) Spreng. | 38 | documented |
| Trochocarpa cunninghamii | (DC.) W.M.Curtis | 5 | documented |
| Trochocarpa arfakensis | (Kaneh. & Hatus.) Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa bellendenkerensis | Domin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa celebica | (J.J.Sm.) Steenis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa clarkei | (F.Muell.) F.Muell. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa dekockii | (J.J.Sm.) H.J.Lam | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa dispersa | Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa disticha | (Labill.) Spreng. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa gjellerupii | (J.J.Sm.) H.J.Lam | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa gunnii | (Hook.f.) Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa montana | J.B.Williams & J.T.Hunter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa novae-zealandiae | Colenso | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa nubicola | (Wernham) Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa nutans | (J.J.Sm.) H.J.Lam | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trochocarpa papuana | (C.H.Wright) Sleumer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.