Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristellateia australasiae | A.Rich. | 11 | documented |
| Tristellateia acutifolia | Boivin ex Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia africana | S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia ambondrensis | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia ambongensis | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia bernieriana | A.Juss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia bojeriana | A.Juss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia cocculifolia | A.Juss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia cordifolia | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia dulcamara | A.Juss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia goudotii | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia grandiflora | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia greveana | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia isalensis | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia madagascariensis | Poir. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia ovalifolia | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia pubescens | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia rigalii | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia sancti-andreae | Arènes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia stenactis | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristellateia stenoptera | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.