Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristagma patagonicum | (Baker) Traub | 19 | documented |
| Tristagma nivale | Poepp. | 8 | documented |
| Tristagma ameghinoi | (Speg.) Speg. | 4 | documented |
| Tristagma bivalve | (Hook. ex Lindl.) Traub | 4 | documented |
| Tristagma gracile | (Phil.) Traub | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma violaceum | (Kunth) Traub | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma anemophilum | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma atreucoense | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma berteri | Phil | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma berteroi | (Kunth) S.C.Arroyo & Sassone | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma circinatum | (Sandwith) Traub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma fragrans | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma graminifolium | (Phil.) Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma lineatum | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma lomarum | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma malalhuense | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma nahuelhuapinum | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma poeppigianum | (Gay) Traub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma porrifolium | (Poepp.) Traub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma sociale | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma staminosum | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristagma yauriense | Ravenna | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.