Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tristachya leucothrix | Trin. ex Nees | 64 | documented |
| Tristachya biseriata | Stapf | 13 | documented |
| Tristachya humbertii | A.Camus | 8 | documented |
| Tristachya leiostachya | Nees | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya angustifolia | Hitchc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya auronitens | J.Duvign. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya avenacea | (J.Presl) Scribn. & Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya bequaertii | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya betsileensis | A.Camus | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya bicrinita | (J.B.Phipps) Clayton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya contrerasii | R.Guzmán | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya hubbardiana | Conert | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya huillensis | Rendle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya laxa | Scribn. & Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya lualabaensis | (De Wild.) J.B.Phipps | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya nodiglumis | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya papilosa | R.Guzmán | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya pedicellata | Stent | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya rehmannii | Hack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya superba | (De Not.) Schweinf. & Asch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya thollonii | Franch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tristachya viridearistata | (J.B.Phipps) Clayton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.