Trisetum

Accepted species 26 Documented here 2 Family Poaceae

Accepted species 26 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Trisetum flavescens (L.) P.Beauv. 185 documented
Trisetum glomeratum (Kunth) Trin. ex Steud. 6 documented
Trisetum alpestre (Host) P.Beauv. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum altaicum Roshev. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum ambiguum RĂºgolo & Nicora 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum antarcticum Trin. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum argenteum (Willd.) Roem. & Schult. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum bertolonii Jonsell 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum buschianum Seredin 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum caudulatum Trin. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum clarkei (Hook.f.) R.R.Stewart 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum debile Chrtek 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum fuscum (Kit. ex Schult.) Schult. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum gracile (Moris) Boiss. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum laconicum Boiss. & Orph. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum longiglume Hack. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum macbridei Hitchc. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum macrotrichum Hack. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum orthochaetum Hitchc. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum phleoides Kunth 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum rigidum (M.Bieb.) Roem. & Schult. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum scitulum Bor 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum subspontaneum (Tzvelev) Czerep. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum tamonanteae Marrero Rodr. & S.Scholz 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum velutinum Boiss. 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetum yunnanense Chrtek 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.