Trisetella

Accepted species 28 Documented here 0 Family Orchidaceae

Accepted species 28 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Trisetella abbreviata Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella andreettae Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella cordeliae Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella dalstroemii Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella deburghgraevei Vierling 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella didyma (Luer) Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella dressleri (Luer) Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella escobarii Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella fissidens Luer & Hirtz 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella gemmata (Rchb.f.) Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella hirtzii Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella hoeijeri Luer & Hirtz 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella klingeri Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella lasiochila Pupulin 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella nodulifera Luer & Hirtz 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella pachycaudata Mogr.-Herrera & Baquero 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella pantex (Luer) Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella portillae A.Doucette 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella regia Königer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella rollingstonesiana Vierling 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella sauliana Vierling 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella scobina Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella sororia Luer & Andreetta 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella strumosa Luer & Andreetta 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella tenuissima (C.Schweinf.) Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella triaristella (Rchb.f.) Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella triglochin (Rchb.f.) Luer 0 below the evidence gate
Trisetella vittata (Luer) Luer 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.