Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tripsacum dactyloides | (L.) L. | 946 | documented |
| Tripsacum jalapense | De Wet & Brink | 10 | documented |
| Tripsacum andersonii | J.R.Gray | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum australe | Cutler & E.S.Anderson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum cundinamarce | De Wet & Timothy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum intermedium | De Wet & J.R.Harlan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum lanceolatum | E.Fourn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum latifolium | Hitchc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum laxum | Nash | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum maizar | Hern.-Xol. & Randolph | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum manisuroides | De Wet & J.R.Harlan | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum peruvianum | De Wet & Timothy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum pilosum | Scribn. & Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripsacum zopilotense | Hern.-Xol. & Randolph | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.