Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tripogandra diuretica | (Mart.) Handlos | 87 | documented |
| Tripogandra purpurascens | (S.Schauer) Handlos | 83 | documented |
| Tripogandra serrulata | (Vahl) Handlos | 80 | documented |
| Tripogandra amplexicaulis | (Klotzsch ex C.B.Clarke) Woodson | 13 | documented |
| Tripogandra disgrega | (Kunth) Woodson | 7 | documented |
| Tripogandra ionantha | (Diels) J.F.Macbr. | 7 | documented |
| Tripogandra glandulosa | (Seub.) Rohweder | 6 | documented |
| Tripogandra grandiflora | (Donn.Sm.) Woodson | 5 | documented |
| Tripogandra amplexans | Handlos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra angustifolia | (B.L.Rob.) Woodson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra brasiliensis | Handlos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra elata | D.R.Hunt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra encolea | (Diels) J.F.Macbr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra guerrerensis | Matuda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra kruseana | Matuda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra montana | Handlos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra multiflora | (Sw.) Raf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra neglecta | Handlos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra palmeri | (Rose) Woodson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra saxicola | (Greenm.) Woodson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra silvatica | Handlos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tripogandra warmingiana | (Seub.) Handlos | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.