Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Triplaris americana | L. | 40 | documented |
| Triplaris melaenodendron | (Bertol.) Standl. & Steyerm. | 24 | documented |
| Triplaris cumingiana | Fisch. & C.A.Mey. ex C.A.Mey. | 9 | documented |
| Triplaris caracasana | Cham. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris dugandii | Brandbyge | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris efistulifera | Rusby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris fulva | Huber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris gardneriana | Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris longifolia | Huber | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris moyobambensis | Brandbyge | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris peruviana | C.A.Mey. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris physocalyx | Brandbyge | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris poeppigiana | Wedd. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris punctata | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris purdiae | Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris purdiei | Meisn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris setosa | Rusby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris vestita | Rusby | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Triplaris weigeltiana | (Rchb.) Kuntze | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.