Tricyrtis

Accepted species 24 Documented here 6 Family Liliaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Tricyrtis formosana Baker 106 documented
Tricyrtis lasiocarpa Matsum. 21 documented
Tricyrtis hirta (Thunb.) Hook. 19 documented
Tricyrtis macropoda Miq. 13 documented
Tricyrtis affinis Makino 12 documented
Tricyrtis suzukii Masam. 11 documented
Tricyrtis latifolia Maxim. 2 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis bilushenmulata S.S.Ying 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis chinensis Hir.Takah.bis 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis dilatata Nakai 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis flava Maxim. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis imeldae Guthnick 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis ishiiana (Kitag. & T.Koyama) Ohwi & Okuyama 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis macrantha Maxim. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis macranthopsis Masam. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis maculata (D.Don) J.F.Macbr. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis nana Yatabe 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis ohsumiensis Masam. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis perfoliata Masam. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis puberula Nakai & Kitag. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis setouchiensis Hir.Takah. 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis tachingshuii S.S.Ying 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis uniflora S.S.Ying 0 below the evidence gate
Tricyrtis xianjuensis G.Y.Li, Z.H.Chen & D.D.Ma 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.