Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trichocline reptans | Hieron. | 15 | documented |
| Trichocline aurea | Reiche | 11 | documented |
| Trichocline catharinensis | Cabrera | 7 | documented |
| Trichocline caulescens | Phil. | 7 | documented |
| Trichocline dealbata | (Hook. & Arn.) Griseb. | 6 | documented |
| Trichocline sinuata | (D.Don) Cabrera | 6 | documented |
| Trichocline spathulata | (A.Cunn. ex DC.) J.H.Willis | 6 | documented |
| Trichocline boecheri | Cabrera | 3 | documented |
| Trichocline incana | Cass. | 3 | documented |
| Trichocline plicata | Hook. & Arn. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline auriculata | Hieron. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline cineraria | Hook. & Arn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline cisplatina | E.Pasini & M.R.Ritter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline crispata | Cabrera | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline deserticola | Zardini | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline eriopus | (Sch.Bip.) Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline exscapa | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline heterophylla | Less. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline hieracioides | (Kunth) Ferreyra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline humilis | Less. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline linearifolia | Malme | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline macrocephala | Less. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline macrorhiza | Cabrera | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline maxima | Less. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trichocline speciosa | Less. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.