Trattinnickia

Accepted species 20 Documented here 0 Family Burseraceae

Accepted species 20 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Trattinnickia aspera (Standl.) Swart 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia boliviana (Swart) Daly 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia burserifolia Mart. 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia dalyana M.F.F.Melo & J.U.Santos 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia demerarae Sandwith 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia ferruginea Kuhlm. 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia glaziovii Swart 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia lancifolia (Cuatrec.) Daly 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia lawrancei Standl. ex Swart 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia laxiflora Swart 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia lorenziana Daly & M.F.F.Melo 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia mensalis Daly 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia nebulae M.F.F.Melo & Daly 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia panamensis Standl. & L.O.Williams 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia peruviana Loes. 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia rhenocaulis Daly & M.F.F.Melo 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia rhoifolia Willd. 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia vacciniflora Daly & M.F.F.Melo 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia vulturina Daly & M.F.F.Melo 0 below the evidence gate
Trattinnickia zickeliana M.F.F.Melo & Daly 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.