Toxocarpus

Accepted species 23 Documented here 1 Family Apocynaceae

Accepted species 23 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Toxocarpus wightianus Hook. & Arn. 13 documented
Toxocarpus barbatus Schltr. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus beddomei Gamble 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus concanensis Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus cyclosepalus Markgr. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus ellipticus Schltr. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus eriocarpus Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus excisus Schltr. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus fuscus Tsiang 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus hainanensis Tsiang 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus himalensis Falc. ex Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus kleinii Wight & Arn. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus kurzii Hook.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus laevigatus Tsiang 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus longistigma (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. ex Steud. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus oliganthus Schltr. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus palghatensis Gamble 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus patens Tsiang 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus paucinervius Tsiang 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus pierrei Costantin 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus rubricaulis Elmer 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus villosus (Blume) Decne. 0 below the evidence gate
Toxocarpus wangianus Tsiang 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.