Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tolpis succulenta | (Aiton) Lowe | 233 | documented |
| Tolpis barbata | (L.) Gaertn. | 191 | documented |
| Tolpis staticifolia | (All.) Sch.Bip. | 44 | documented |
| Tolpis umbellata | Bertol. | 16 | documented |
| Tolpis macrorhiza | (Lowe) DC. | 15 | documented |
| Tolpis macrorhiza | (Lowe) Lowe | 15 | documented |
| Tolpis lagopoda | C.Sm. ex Link | 6 | documented |
| Tolpis calderae | Bolle | 4 | documented |
| Tolpis azorica | (Nutt.) P.Silva | 3 | documented |
| Tolpis webbii | Sch.Bip. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis × grossii | Talavera | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis capensis | (L.) Sch.Bip. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis coronopifolia | (Desf.) Biv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis crassiuscula | Svent. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis farinulosa | (Webb) J.A.Schmidt | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis glabrescens | Kämmer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis laciniata | (Sch.Bip.) Webb | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis liouvillei | Braun-Blanq. & Maire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis mbalensis | G.V.Pope | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis nemoralis | Font Quer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis proustii | Pit. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis santosii | D.J.Crawford, Mort & J.K.Archibald | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tolpis virgata | (Desf.) Bertol. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.