Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tina isaloensis | Drake | 5 | documented |
| Tina antongiliensis | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina apiculata | Radlk. ex Choux | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina chapelieriana | (Cambess.) Kalkman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina chrysophylla | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina conjugata | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina coursii | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina dasycarpa | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina dissitiflora | (Baker) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina fulvinervis | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina isoneura | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina macrocarpa | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina phellocarpa | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina striata | Radlk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina suarezensis | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina tamatavensis | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina thouarsiana | (Cambess.) Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina urschii | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tina vadonii | (Capuron) Callm. & Buerki | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.