Tetrorchidium

Accepted species 23 Documented here 1 Family Euphorbiaceae

Accepted species 23 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Tetrorchidium euryphyllum Standl. 7 documented
Tetrorchidium andinum Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium brevifolium Standl. & Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium bulbipilosum Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium congolense J.Léonard 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium costaricense Huft 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium didymostemon (Baill.) Pax & K.Hoffm. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium duckei Radcl.-Sm. & Govaerts 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium dusenii Pax & K.Hoffm. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium gabonense Breteler 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium hirsutum J.Murillo & K.Wurdack 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium jamaicense Croizat 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium macrophyllum Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium microphyllum Huft 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium ochroleucum Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium oppositifolium (Pax) Pax 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium parvulum Müll.Arg. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium popayanense Croizat 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium robledoanum Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium rotundatum Standl. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium rubrivenium Poepp. & Endl. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium trichotocarpum McPherson 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrorchidium ulugurense Verdc. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.