Tetrapilus

Accepted species 21 Documented here 1 Family Oleaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Tetrapilus dioicus (Roxb.) L.A.S.Johnson 87 documented
Tetrapilus borneensis (Boerl.) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus brachiatus Lour. 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus caudatilimbus (L.C.Chia) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus cordatulus (H.L.Li) L.A.S.Johnson 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus gagnepainii (Knobl.) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus gamblei (C.B.Clarke) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus hainanensis (H.L.Li) L.A.S.Johnson 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus javanicus (Blume) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus laxiflorus (H.L.Li) L.A.S.Johnson 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus moluccensis (Kiew) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus neriifolius (H.L.Li) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus palawanensis (Kiew) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus parvilimbus (Merr. & Chun) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus polygamus (Wight) L.A.S.Johnson 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus roseus (Craib) L.A.S.Johnson 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus rubrovenius (Elmer) L.A.S.Johnson 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus salicifolius (Wall. ex G.Don) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus tetragonocladus (L.C.Chia) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus tsoongii (Merr.) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate
Tetrapilus wightianus (Wall. ex G.Don) de Juana 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.