Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tetradenia riparia | (Hochst.) Codd | 58 | documented |
| Tetradenia brevispicata | (N.E.Br.) Codd | 10 | documented |
| Tetradenia galpinii | (N.E.Br.) Phillipson & C.F.Steyn | 8 | documented |
| Tetradenia goudotii | Briq. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia bainesii | (N.E.Br.) Phillipson & C.F.Steyn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia barberae | (N.E.Br.) Codd | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia clementiana | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia cordata | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia discolor | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia falafa | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia fruticosa | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia herbacea | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia hildeana | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia isaloensis | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia kaokoensis | van Jaarsv. & A.E.van Wyk | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia multiflora | (Benth.) Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia nervosa | Codd | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia tanganyikae | Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia tuberosa | T.J.Edwards | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tetradenia urticifolia | (Baker) Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.