Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terpsichore alfaroi | (Donn.Sm.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore alsophilicola | (Christ) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore aspleniifolia | (L.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore atroviridis | (Copel.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore bipinnata | (Stolze) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore chrysleri | (Copel.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore dolorensis | (Hieron.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore eggersii | (Baker ex Hook.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore exornans | (Maxon) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore flexuosa | (Maxon) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore hanekeana | (Proctor) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore jenmanii | (Underw. ex Maxon) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore lehmanniana | (Hieron.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore liogieri | (Proctor) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore paulistana | (Brade & Rosenst.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Terpsichore staheliana | (Posth.) A.R.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.