Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teagueia alyssana | Luer & L.Jost | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia anitana | L.Jost & Shepard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia barbeliana | L.Jost & Shepard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia beverlysacklerae | L.Jost & Shepard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia cymbisepala | Luer & L.Jost | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia jostii | Luer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia kostoglouana | L.Jost & Shepard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia lehmannii | Luer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia lizziefinchiana | L.Jost & Shepard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia moisesii | Chocce & M.E.Acuña | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia phasmida | (Luer & R.Escobar) O.Gruss & M.Wolff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia portillae | Luer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia puroana | L.Jost & Shepard | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia rex | (Luer & R.Escobar) O.Gruss & M.Wolff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia sancheziae | Luer & L.Jost | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia teaguei | (Luer) Luer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia tentaculata | Luer & Hirtz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Teagueia zeus | (Luer & Hirtz) O.Gruss & M.Wolff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.