Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tapeinidium pinnatum | (Cav.) C.Chr. | 9 | documented |
| Tapeinidium biserratum | (Blume) Alderw. | 7 | documented |
| Tapeinidium moorei | (Hook.) Hieron. | 3 | documented |
| Tapeinidium acuminatum | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium atratum | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium buniifolium | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium calomelanos | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium carolinense | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium denhamii | (Hook.) C.Chr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium gracile | (Blume) Alderw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium longipinnulum | (Ces.) C.Chr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium luzonicum | (Hook.) K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium melanesicum | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium moluccanum | (Blume) C.Chr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium novoguineense | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium obtusatum | Alderw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium oligophlebium | (Baker) C.Chr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium prionoides | K.U.Kramer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tapeinidium stenocarpum | Alderw. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.