Tanaecium

Accepted species 22 Documented here 2 Family Bignoniaceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Tanaecium dichotomum (Jacq.) Kaehler & L.G.Lohmann 21 documented
Tanaecium selloi (Spreng.) L.G.Lohmann 4 documented
Tanaecium pyramidatum (Rich.) L.G.Lohmann 2 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium affine (A.H.Gentry) L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium apiculatum A.H.Gentry 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium bilabiatum (Sprague) L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium caudiculatum (Standl.) L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium crucigerum Seem. 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium cyrtanthum (Mart. ex DC.) Bureau & K.Schum. 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium decorticans Frazão & L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium duckei A.Samp. 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium exitiosum Dugand 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium jaroba Sw. 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium kuhlmannii (J.C.Gomes) Frazão & L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium neobrasiliense L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium paradoxum (Sandwith) Kaehler & L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium parviflorum (Mart. ex DC.) Kaehler & L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium revillae (A.H.Gentry) L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium tetragonolobum (Jacq.) L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium tetramerum (A.H.Gentry) Zuntini & L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium truncatum (A.Samp.) L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate
Tanaecium xanthophyllum (DC.) L.G.Lohmann 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.