Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tacca leontopetaloides | (L.) Kuntze | 78 | documented |
| Tacca chantrieri | André | 24 | documented |
| Tacca cristata | Jack | 7 | documented |
| Tacca integrifolia | Ker Gawl. | 6 | documented |
| Tacca borneensis | Ridl. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca palmata | Blume | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca ampliplacenta | L.Zhang & Q.J.Li | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca ankaranensis | Bard.-Vauc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca bibracteata | Drenth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca celebica | Koord. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca ebeltajae | Drenth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca havilandii | S.Y.Wong & K.S.Chua | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca khanhhoaensis | V.S.Dang & Vuong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca lanceolata | Spruce | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca maculata | Seem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca palmatifida | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca parkeri | Seem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca plantaginea | (Hance) Drenth | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca reducta | P.C.Boyce & S.Julia | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Tacca subflabellata | P.P.Ling & C.T.Ting | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.