Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sundamomum borealiborneense | (I.M.Turner) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum bungoense | (Aimi Syaz. & Meekiong) Salasiah & Meekiong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum calyptratum | (S.Sakai & Nagam.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum dictyocoleum | (K.Schum.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum durum | (S.Sakai & Nagam.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum flavoalbum | (R.M.Sm.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum hastilabium | (Ridl.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum laxesquamosum | (K.Schum.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum longipedunculatum | (R.M.Sm.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum luteum | (R.M.Sm.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum macroglossa | (K.Schum.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum oligophyllum | (A.J.Droop) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum paucifolium | (R.M.Sm.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum pseudofoetens | (Valeton) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Sundamomum somniculosum | (S.Sakai & Nagam.) A.D.Poulsen & M.F.Newman | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.