Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stomatanthes africanus | (Oliv. & Hiern) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 8 | documented |
| Stomatanthes corumbensis | (B.L.Rob.) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes dentatus | (Gardner) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes dyctiophyllus | (DC.) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes helenae | (Buscal. & Muschl.) Lisowski | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes hirsutus | H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes loefgrenii | (B.L.Rob.) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes meyeri | R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes oblongifolius | (Sch.Bip. ex Baker) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes oblongifolius | (Baker) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes pernambucensis | (B.L.Rob.) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes pinnatipartitus | (Sch.Bip. ex Baker) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes polycephalus | (Sch.Bip. ex B.L.Rob.) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes reticulatus | Grossi & J.N.Nakaj. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes subcapitatus | (Malme) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes trigonus | (Gardner) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes warmingii | (Baker) H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stomatanthes zambiensis | R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.