Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stewartia malacodendron | L. | 60 | documented |
| Stewartia ovata | (Cav.) Weath. | 48 | documented |
| Stewartia monadelpha | Siebold & Zucc. | 17 | documented |
| Stewartia pseudocamellia | Maxim. | 3 | documented |
| Stewartia pteropetiolata | W.C.Cheng | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia acutisepala | P.L.Chiu & G.R.Zhong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia calcicola | T.L.Ming & J.Li | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia cordifolia | (H.L.Li) J.Li & T.L.Ming | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia crassifolia | (S.Z.Yan) J.Li & T.L.Ming | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia densivillosa | (Hu ex Hung T.Chang & C.X.Ye) J.Li & T.L.Ming | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia laotica | (Gagnep.) J.Li & T.L.Ming | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia medogensis | J.Li & T.L.Ming | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia micrantha | (Chun) Sealy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia obovata | (Chun ex Hung T.Chang) J.Li & T.L.Ming | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia rostrata | Spongberg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia rubiginosa | Hung T.Chang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia serrata | Maxim. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia sichuanensis | (S.Z.Yan) J.Li & T.L.Ming | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia sinensis | Rehder & E.H.Wilson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia sinii | (Y.C.Wu) Sealy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia tonkinensis | (Merr.) C.Y.Wu ex J.Li | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Stewartia villosa | Merr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.